Finally, the issue of corruption, the hostage money politics (and therefore of the war), in a country where you do not look for the truth, but you try to hide it. Then in the parable Snowden was there, ready and waiting, the voluntary military training speech, which goes hand in hand with the question about patriotism as a backdrop in many films of the director of JFK (who is more faithful to the spirit American: those who dispute or who obeys?). First, the biography is a genre that in Stone succeeds well, especially because, where there is a true story and a known history, can indulge themselves in the stage that most intrigues him, namely the assembly. The case Snowden, with its stretches of abuse and paranoia, seemed made to end in a film by Oliver Stone and in many ways is actually located in the right place. In 2013, holed up in a hotel room in Hong Kong, the twenty-nine Edward Snowden, former coach of the CIA and the NSA computer consultant, revealed, sensitive data in hand, the British newspaper The Guardian and documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras, l ‘ existence of different mass surveillance programs, kept secret intelligence programs, which guarantee the US government an extremely invasive monitoring level and against any privacy rights on its territory and the rest of the world, passed with the security excuse. Posted in: 2016, Documentary, Movies on: January 4
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |